Direct Rule Vs Indirect Rule

Arrangement of governance used past colonial powers

Indirect dominion was a arrangement of governance used by the British and others to control parts of their colonial empires, particularly in Africa and Asia, which was done through pre-existing indigenous ability structures. Indirect rule was used past diverse colonial rulers: the French in Algeria and Tunisia, the Dutch in the Eastward Indies, the Portuguese in Angola and Mozambique and the Belgians in Rwanda and Burundi. These dependencies were ofttimes chosen "protectorates" or "trucial states". By this arrangement, the day-to-day authorities and administration of areas both small and large were left in the hands of traditional rulers, who gained prestige and the stability and protection afforded by the Pax Britannica (in the case of British territories), at the cost of losing control of their external affairs, and often of revenue enhancement, communications, and other matters, ordinarily with a small number of European "advisors" effectively overseeing the authorities of large numbers of people spread over all-encompassing areas.^[1]

British Empire [edit]

Some British colonies were ruled direct by the Colonial Part in London, while others were ruled indirectly through local rulers who are supervised behind the scenes past British advisors. In 1890 Zanzibar became a protectorate (not a colony) of Britain. British Prime Government minister Salisbury explained his position:

The condition of a protected dependency is more acceptable to the one-half civilized races, and more suitable for them than direct dominion. Information technology is cheaper, simpler, less wounding to their self-esteem, gives them more than career as public officials, and spares of unnecessary contact with white men.^[2]

The Princely states of India were too ruled indirectly, with the Indian territories ruled indirectly experiencing similar effects to those in Africa that experienced indirect rule.^[three] The same went for many of the West African holdings of the British and French empires.^[iv]

In Africa [edit]

The ideological underpinnings, equally well as the applied application, of 'indirect rul' in Uganda and Nigeria is unremarkably traced to the work of Frederick Lugard, the High Commissioner of the Protectorate of Northern Nigeria from 1899 to 1906. Indirect rule was by no means a new idea at the time since it had been in employ in ruling empires throughout history. For instance, in improver to India and Uganda, it had been practiced in the Songhai and Ashanti Empires.

In the lands of the Sokoto Caliphate, conquered past the British at the turn of the century, Lugard instituted a organisation whereby external, armed services, and taxation control was operated by the British, while most every other aspect of life was left to local pre-conquest ethnic aristocracies who may take sided with the British during or after their conquest. The theory behind this solution to a very applied trouble (a trouble referred to every bit 'The Native Problem' by Mahmood Mamdani in his work Citizen and Discipline) of control by a tiny group of foreigners of huge populations is laid out in Lugard'due south influential work, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa. Lugard copied the numerous empires before his time who had created and adult the indirect dominion system.

According to Lugard, Indirect Dominion was a political doctrine which held that the Europeans and Africans were culturally different to this extent, Africans had to be ruled through the Africans ain establishment. To achieve this objective:

• Chiefs and or Royalty continued to practise their traditional powers over their subjects;
• Chiefs were appointed for areas with no chiefs; and
• Aspects of traditional authorities repugnant to "European ideas of what constituted government were modified." east.g. the abolition of man sacrifice.

It has been pointed out that the British were non prepared to pay for colonial assistants, though interested in economically benefiting from their new colonies; neither aspect had the British enough resources to finance it. This economic question coupled with the shortage of or lack of European personnel in Africa at the time convinced the British that it would be cheaper to utilize the traditional institutions to reach the same objective. The nature and operation of indirect rule in Northern Nigerian, amply confirm these contentions. When Lugard and his men conquered the Sokoto Caliphate of Northern Nigeria, in early twentieth century, his limited resources in terms of men and money, fabricated it impracticable for him to dominion the vast territory. Fortunately for him, even so, the Sokoto Caliphate already possessed a highly adult and efficient organisation of assistants headed by emirs, with the Sultan of Sokoto as the supreme head. The hierarchical nature of the political structure was ideal for the arrangement of indirect dominion because the British could command the emirs and the emirs in plow could control their people.^[5]

In the mid-1920s, the British implemented a system of indirect dominion in Tanzania.^[6]

Practical implementation [edit]

Indirect rule was cheaper and easier for the European powers and, in particular, it required fewer administrators, just had a number of bug. In many cases, European authorities empowered local traditional leaders, as in the example of the monarchy of Uganda, but if no suitable leader could be found (in the traditional Western sense of the term), the Europeans would but choose local rulers to adjust them.^[7] This was the case in Republic of kenya and Southern Nigeria, and the new leaders, often called "warrant chiefs", were not always supported by the local population. The European ruling classes also oftentimes chose local leaders with similar traits to their ain, despite these traits non being suited to native leadership. Many were conservative elders, and thus indirect rule fostered a conservative outlook among the indigenous population and marginalised the young intelligentsia. Written laws, which replaced oral laws, were less flexible to the changing social nature, old community of retribution and justice were removed or banned, and the removal of more trigger-happy punishments in some areas led to an increase in crime.^{[ citation needed ]} Furthermore, leaders empowered by the governments of European powers were often non familiar with their new tasks, such equally recruitment and tax.^[8]

Interpretations [edit]

From the early 20th century, French and British writers helped establish a dichotomy between British indirect rule, exemplified past the Indian princely states and by Lugard's writings on the administration of northern Nigeria, and French colonial direct rule. As with British theorists, French colonial officials like Félix Eboué or Robert Delavignette^[nine] wrote and argued throughout the first one-half of the 20th century for a distinct French mode of rule that was centralized, compatible, and aimed at assimilating colonial subjects into the French polity.^{[10] [xi] [12]} French rule, sometimes labeled Jacobin, was said in these writings to be based on the twin ideologies of the centralized unitary French authorities of the Metropole, with the French colonial credo of Assimilation. Colonial Assimilation argued that French law and citizenship was based on universal values that came from the French Revolution. Mirroring French domestic citizenship police, French colonial law immune for anyone who could prove themselves culturally French (the "Évolués") to become equal French citizens.^{[13] [14] [fifteen] [xvi] [17]} In French West Africa, only parts of the Senegalese "Four Communes" ever extended French citizenship exterior a few educated African aristocracy.^{[18] [19]}

While making more than subtle distinctions, this model of directly versus indirect rule was dominant in academia from the 1930s^[xx] until the 1970s.^{[21] [22] [23]}

Academics since the 1970s have problematised the Straight versus Indirect Rule dichotomy,^[24] arguing the systems were in practice intermingled in both British and French colonial governance, and that the perception of indirect rule was sometimes promoted to justify quite direct dominion structures.^{[25] [26]}

Mahmood Mamdani and other academics^{[27] [28]} have discussed extensively how both direct and indirect rule were attempts to implement identical goals of foreign rule, but how the "indirect" strategy helped to create ethnic tensions within ruled societies which persist in hostile communal relations and dysfunctional strategies of government.^{[29] [30]} Mamdani himself famously described indirect rule as "decentralised despotism".^[31]

Some political scientists accept even expanded the debate on how direct versus indirect dominion experiences continue to touch contemporary governance into how governments which have never experienced being under colonial rule function.^[32]

See also [edit]

• Bussa revolt – a 1915 uprising against indirect rule in Northern Nigeria
• Directly colonial rule
• Assay of Western European colonialism and colonization
• Neocolonialism

References [edit]

1. ^ The American Historical Association. "ENGLAND'S INDIRECT Rule IN ITS AFRICAN COLONIES" in THROUGH THE LENS OF HISTORY: BIAFRA, NIGERIA, THE Due west AND THE Earth. AHA education guide, historians.org, north.d. Accessed 2012-09-twenty http://www.historians.org/tl/lessonplans/nc/trask/indirect.htm
2. ^ Andrew Roberts, Salisbury: Victorian Titan (1999) p 529
3. ^ Lakshmi Iyer, "Direct versus indirect colonial rule in India: Long-term consequences." The Review of Economic science and Statistics (2010) 92#4 pp: 693-713 online Archived 2014-09-03 at the Wayback Machine.
4. ^ Adiele Eberechukwu Afigbo, The Warrant Chiefs: indirect rule in southeastern Nigeria, 1891-1929 (London: Longman, 1972)
5. ^ Dr. Ofosu-Mensah Ababio Ofosu-Mensah E.A. Gold Mining in Adanse: pre-colonial and modern. Sarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2014
6. ^ Liebenow, J. Gus (1956). "Responses to Planned Political Alter in a Tanganyika Tribal Group". American Political Science Review. 50 (2): 447–448. doi:ten.2307/1951678. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1951678. S2CID 144390538.
7. ^ Eric J. Hobsbawm, Terence O. Ranger, 'The Invention of Tradition' (1983)
8. ^ Collins and Burns, pp. 297-308
9. ^ Robert Louis Delavignette. Freedom and Say-so in French West Africa. originally published as Les vrais chefs de l'empire: 1939. Oxford University: 1946.
10. ^ Georges Hardy, Histoire sociale de la colonisation française. (Paris, 1953)
11. ^ Raymond F. Betts, Assimilation and Association in French Colonial Theory, 1890-1914 (New York, 1961)
12. ^ Martin D. Lewis, "I Hundred Million Frenchmen: The Assimilationist Theory in French Colonial Policy," Comparative Studies in Society and History Iv (Jan 1962), 129-153.
13. ^ Erik Bleich, 'The legacies of history? Colonization and immigrant integration in Britain and French republic. Theory and Society, Volume 34, Number 2, April 2005.
14. ^ Michael Crowder' in Senegal: A Study in French Assimilation Policy (London: Oxford University Press, 1962)
15. ^ Mamadou Diouf, 'The French Colonial Policy of Absorption and the Civility of the Originaires of the Four Communes (Senegal): A Nineteenth Century Globalization Projection' in Evolution and Change, Book 29, Number 4, October 1998, pp. 671–696(26)
16. ^ M. M. Knight, 'French Colonial Policy—the Decline of "Association"' in The Journal of Mod History, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Jun., 1933), pp. 208–224
17. ^ Michael Lambert, 'From Citizenship to Negritude: Making a difference in elite ideologies of colonized Francophone Westward Africa' in Comparative Studies in Club and History, Vol. 35, No. ii. (Apr., 1993), pp. 239–262
18. ^ G. Wesley Johnson, Jr., The Emergence of Blackness Politics in Senegal: The Struggle for Ability in the Iv Communes, 1900–1920 (1972)
19. ^ James F. Searing, 'Senegal: Colonial Period: Four Communes: Dakar, Saint-Louis, Gorée, and Rufisque', in Kevin Shillington (editor), Encyclopedia of African History (New York, 2005): 3 Volumes, iii, 1334–35
20. ^ Ralph J. Bunche, 'French and British Imperialism in West Africa' in The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 21, No. ane. (Jan., 1936), pp. 31–46
21. ^ Michael Crowder, 'Indirect Rule: French and British Style' in Africa: Periodical of the International African Institute, Vol. 34, No. 3. (Jul., 1964), pp. 197–205
22. ^ Alec Chiliad. Hargreaves, ed. Retention, Empire, and Postcolonialism: Legacies of French Colonialism (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2005; ISBN 9780739108215)
23. ^ Ann Laura Stoler (1989), 'Rethinking Colonial Categories: European Communities and the Boundaries of Rule' in Comparative Studies in Gild and History, 31, pp 134-161 doi:10.1017/S0010417500015693
24. ^ Jonathan Derrick, 'The 'Native Clerk' in Colonial W Africa' in African Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 326. (January., 1983), pp. 61–74.
25. ^ Emily Lynn Osborn (2003). 'CIRCLE OF Fe': AFRICAN COLONIAL EMPLOYEES AND THE INTERPRETATION OF COLONIAL RULE IN FRENCH WEST AFRICA. The Journal of African History, 44, pp 29-50 doi:10.1017/S0021853702008307
26. ^ Anthony I. Nwabughuogu. The Role of Propaganda in the Development of Indirect Rule in Nigeria, 1890-1929. The International Journal of African Historical Studies Vol. fourteen, No. i (1981), pp. 65-92
27. ^ Paul Rich. The Origins of Apartheid Ideology: The Case of Ernest Stubbs and Transvaal Native Administration, c.1902-1932. African Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 315. (Apr., 1980), pp. 171–194.
28. ^ Lakshmi Iyer (2010). Direct versus Indirect Colonial Rule in India: Long-Term Consequences. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Nov 2010, Vol. 92, No. 4, Pages 693-713
29. ^ Mahmood Mamdani. Indirect Rule, Ceremonious Society, and Ethnicity: The African Dilemma. Social Justice Vol. 23, No. ane/ii (63-64), The Globe Today (Jump-Summer 1996), pp. 145-150
30. ^ Mahmood Mamdani. Historicizing ability and responses to power: indirect dominion and its reform. Social Enquiry Vol. 66, No. three, PROSPECTS FOR Republic (Fall 1999), pp. 859-886
31. ^ Mahmood Mamdani, Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism (1996), p. 37.
32. ^ John Gerring, Daniel Ziblatt, Johan Van Gorp and Julián Arévalo (2011). An Institutional Theory of Direct and Indirect Dominion. World Politics, 63, pp 377-433 doi:x.1017/S0043887111000104

Sources and references [edit]

• Michael Crowder. Indirect Dominion: French and British Way. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, Vol. 34, No. iii. (Jul., 1964), pp. 197–205.
• Paul Rich . The Origins of Apartheid Credo: The Example of Ernest Stubbs and Transvaal Native Administration, c.1902-1932. African Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 315. (Apr., 1980), pp. 171–194.
• Omipidan Teslim

Indirect Rule in Nigeria OldNaija

• H. F. Morris . A History of the Adoption of Codes of Criminal Police force and Procedure in British Colonial Africa, 1876–1935. Journal of African Police, Vol. 18, No. 1, Criminal Police force and Criminology. (Spring, 1974), pp. 6–23.
• Jonathan Derrick. The 'Native Clerk' in Colonial West Africa. African Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 326. (Jan., 1983), pp. 61–74.
• Diana Wylie. Confrontation over Kenya: The Colonial Part and Its Critics 1918–1940. The Journal of African History, Vol. 18, No. three. (1977), pp. 427–447.
• P. A. Brunt . Empires: Reflections on British and Roman Imperialism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 7, No. 3. (Apr., 1965), pp. 267–288.
• R. O. Collins and J. M. Burns. A History of Sub-Saharan Africa, Cambridge, 2007.
• Harrington, Jack (2010), Sir John Malcolm and the Creation of British India, Chs. 4 & 5., New York: Palgrave Macmillan., ISBN978-0-230-10885-ane

Period writings [edit]

• Harold Nicolson. The Colonial Trouble. International Diplomacy, Vol. 17, No. i. (Jan. - Feb., 1938), pp. 32–fifty.
• West. E. Rappard . The Applied Working of the Mandates Organisation. Journal of the British Institute of International Affairs, Vol. iv, No. 5. (Sep., 1925), pp. 205–226.
• Jan Smuts. Native Policy in Africa. Journal of the Regal African Gild, Vol. 29, No. 115. (April., 1930), pp. 248–268.
• Ralph J. Bunche . French and British Imperialism in Westward Africa. The Periodical of Negro History, Vol. 21, No. 1. (January., 1936), pp. 31–46.

Direct Rule Vs Indirect Rule,

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_rule

Posted by: davisstectint.blogspot.com

Share this post